![]() ![]() ![]() The charts do not tell you how to decide, so you consider a randomizer like the second hand on your watch, or the suit of your cards.īut then you look to the big blind, and you see the worst player at the table, who is prone to making big postflop errors. You think back to your preflop study and remember that your hand 3-bets at some frequency on the button against a hijack opener, but it also calls at some frequency. He is an active 4-bettor when faced with a 3-bet, and he makes very few postflop mistakes. It could be ATs, 66, or QJs: You get the idea.Ī tight, winning player raises from the hijack at 100 big blinds deep. ![]() Say you are on the button holding a pretty good but not great hand. Let’s explore two different scenarios: Against a Tight Professional Player or Solid Regular Very often, once your hand is a candidate for 3-betting, the key variable that shapes your decision is who you want to play the hand against. Poker players need to know how to think critically about the situation at hand to make the best play, not merely the book play. They 3-bet certain hands based on the opening position, their own position, and stack sizes, and try to randomize their strategy for certain hands that can play a mixed frequency of 3-betting and calling.ĭoing this establishes a theoretical baseline, but ultimately, memorizing charts is not enough. Since there is a game theory optimal chart for just about every preflop scenario, many players put their heads down and resort to memorization. 18+ | BeGambleAware T&Cs Apply | Read full T&Cs ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |